Saturday, January 14, 2012

People's Choice Awards Face-Off: Morgan Freeman vs. Neil Patrick Harris


Morgan Freeman and Neil Patrick Harris were both among the People's Choice Awards winners last night, as the pictures below make abundantly clear.

Who was the best dressed of the two, talented actors, however?

The How I Met Your Mother star wore his signature suit, while the Hollywood icon went a more casual route, with suit pants and jacket sans tie.

Hey, when you win an award for your icon status, you do what you want! Vote for your favorite style star in THG's Fashion Face-Off below ...

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2012/01/peoples-choice-awards-face-off-morgan-freeman-vs-neil-patrick-ha/

gloria steinem fox news meteor shower tonight annie oakley edc paranormal activity 4 lovelace

Friday, January 13, 2012

Seagate teams with Monster for staggeringly overpriced Momentus XT upgrade kits

Too lazy to pop your existing HDD out in favor of a Momentus XT solid state hybrid drive? There's a Monster for that. In what has to be one of the poorest partnership decisions of the new millennium, Seagate has decided to hitch its wagon to a company famous for scamming customers, suing small businesses and charging a fortune for things that... well, shouldn't cost a fortune. Here at CES, Seagate and Monster Digital are introducing the Dakar series of upgrade kits, which will be offered with 750GB and 500GB models of Seagate's Momentus XT drive at suggested retail prices of $289.99 and $269.99, respectively. For those keeping count, the drives alone will run you around $100 (500GB) and $185 (750GB), which means that you're paying well over a Benjamin for the following: software (not needed; download cloning apps for free), cables (a couple of bucks on Monoprice), an instructional video (Monster should actually pay you to watch this) and a screwdriver (you have ten -- just look). Great product launch, guys. Just great.

Continue reading Seagate teams with Monster for staggeringly overpriced Momentus XT upgrade kits

Seagate teams with Monster for staggeringly overpriced Momentus XT upgrade kits originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/seagate-teams-with-monster-for-staggeringly-overpriced-momentus/

critics choice awards 2012 colbert president huntingtons disease school closings news channel 5 hgtv dream home the firm

Microsoft eclipses Yahoo in US search for 1st time

(AP) ? Microsoft Corp. has finally reached a long-sought and expensive goal ? its Bing search engine now ranks second behind Google in the Internet's most lucrative market.

Bing and Microsoft's other websites fielded 2.75 billion search requests in the U.S. during December, catapulting in front of Yahoo Inc. for the first time in the jockeying for runner up to Google Inc., according to statistics released Wednesday by comScore Inc.

Bing's December volume translated into a 15.1 percent share of the U.S. search traffic, comScore said. Yahoo processed 2.65 billion search requests, representing 14.5 percent of the U.S. market.

Google remained Internet's go-to place for information, with 12 billion U.S. requests in December. That works out to a 65.9 percent market share.

Other research firms track the Internet search market. But comScore's numbers matter the most to industry analysts and the companies trying to attract queries so they can make more money from the ads that appear alongside the results. Google's dominance of online search is the main reason it has established itself as the Internet's most profitable company.

Analysts have expected Microsoft and Yahoo to flip-flop their positions in Internet search since they announced a partnership in July 2009. The 10-year agreement has enabled Yahoo to save money by relying on Microsoft to provide the bulk of its search technology.

Microsoft wanted the deal so it would have billions more search requests to analyze each year, giving it a better chance to learn about people's tendencies and preferences.

Pursuing Google has come at a huge cost for Microsoft, which still makes most of its money from the Windows operating software and other software it sells for personal computers. Microsoft's online division, which is anchored by Bing, has suffered operating losses of about $7 billion since June 2008.

Even though it leans heavily on Microsoft's technology, Yahoo hasn't totally abandoned search. It still offers some unique features within its results in hopes of persuading more people to search on its website instead of going directly to Bing. The main reason: Yahoo still gets 88 percent of the ad revenue from searches conducted on its website and receives nothing from queries entered on Bing.

The efforts haven't been enough to prevent a steady slide in searches at Yahoo. The company's share of the U.S. search market stood at about 19 percent when it joined forces with Microsoft, according to comScore. Meanwhile, Microsoft's market share has climbed from roughly 9 percent.

Yahoo's eroding search share is one of the reasons that its revenue has been falling during the past three years, causing a downturn in its stock price, too. The company just hired Scott Thompson to become the fourth CEO in the past five years to attempt a turnaround at Yahoo.

"Scott Thompson has his work cut out for him," Citigroup analyst Mark Mahaney wrote in a research note breaking down comScore's latest search statistics.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/495d344a0d10421e9baa8ee77029cfbd/Article_2012-01-11-Internet%20Search%20Share/id-a62d51cf275c4ca98e02bf2faf36bf24

king jong il dead south korea baron davis duggar family dingo fidel castro gilbert arenas

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Jail Officials Worried That Amber Portwood Will Shiv Someone


Amber Portwood is under close watch in jail, according to an inside source - her.

A letter the Teen Mom train wreck wrote from inside jail claims that officials even made her use a flexible writing utensil to pen it ... so she won't shiv anyone.

Prisoner-proof pens are standard issue with people viewed as violent threats, but Ambs says people think she's a danger to society and she'll end up in prison.

"I don't think I'll ever take this sh!t for granted," she says. "I'm scared I'm going to prison ... All I think about is Leah and how she needs a ro-model (sic)."

Dangerous Amber

She adds, "I am a good person and I pray that I can change my life."

Amber wrote the letter to her brother last month after she was thrown in an Indiana jail for drug possession and failing to provide a urine test (as per her probation).

She's scheduled to appear in court on Jan. 27 for her probation violation hearing. She faces two years behind bars if convicted, which is not looking like a big stretch.

She's also staring at an eviction hearing in the meantime. Rough.

In the meantime, here's hoping she gets counseling while behind bars and reassesses her life ... while having her belt and shoelaces taken away from her.

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2012/01/jail-officials-worried-amber-portwood-will-shiv-someone/

john hughes panasonic lumix dmc lx5 ucla football taylor momsen deliverance muhammad ali pentatonix

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

tripleight
Reputation: 90
Level: All-Star
Since: Jun 10, 2011

Posted on: January 10, 2012 1:15 pm

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

Skunk - well put, in regards to writers letting their egos get in the way. Look at Jim Rice's numbers and then look at Albert Belle's and tell me which one put together a better career. Belle trumps Rice in just about every way. The reason why Rice got in and Belle didn't had nothing to do with impact; rather, it had everything to do with the writers "getting back" at Belle for being an ahole.

Slugr - nobody cares if you don't go to Cooperstown. If you're such a smug grudge-holder, I'm pretty sure Cooperstown is glad you're not there. Get over yourself. I think McGriff should've been a 1st-ballot HOFer, but he'll probably never get in. Yet I'd still cherish the chance to go to Cooperstown just to see jerseys worn by Gehrig and bats used by Ruth. Stop being a douche.

Skunk
Reputation: 89
Level: All-Star
Since: Oct 26, 2007

Posted on: January 10, 2012 12:32 pm

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

I'm interested to see the reaction from the Steroid Players like McGwire, Palmiero,?and Bonds when someone gets in the Hall who they know was a user.? Will they be irrate that they didn't get in when another user did?? Maybe it's already happened and they're keeping their mouths shut, but eventually someone will "tell all."

Rose?? Banned from baseball means banned from baseball.? If Vegas wants to put him in their Hall, fine.? If you knowingly break a law, or in this case rule, I have no sympathy for you when you get busted. Deal with it.?Loved him as a player though.

Morris should be in.? He may not have been the BEST pitcher of the 80s, but he was top rung. My guess is the Writers thought he was a jerk.? They often let their egos do the voting.

?

slugr1
Reputation: 71
Level: Pro
Since: Jun 26, 2011

Posted on: January 10, 2012 11:26 am

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

The Baseball Hall of Fame is suppose to be for the greatest of the great. I grew up in the Mantle, Maris led Yankees era, but not really a yankee fan. I got to see Clemente play, Hank Aaron play, and right up to present day players. With all the supposely steriod use, a lot of reaaly good players arent going to get in. I will never attend the Hall of Fame until the day that they put Pete Rose in. He deserves to be in for what he done as a player, which is how all these other players got in. The greatest hits leader of all time, and until he gets his due, the Baseall Hall of Fame is a joke.

tripleight
Reputation: 90
Level: All-Star
Since: Jun 10, 2011

Posted on: January 10, 2012 11:19 am

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

First off, I 100% agree that Selig's being the commish should be a crime. This guy is a joke.

What does Rickey Henderson have to do with anything? Just because he played with Canseco and McGwire (not Palmeiro and only Tejada for a short period) doesnt mean he took PEDs, you idiot! Henderson had a fairly natural decline in his numbers as he aged. By far his best seasons came when he was still young and in his prime, unlike most of the others mentioned. And Henderson never officially retired, either. He simply couldnt get signed on. He didnt choose to quit to avoid testing, as you imply.

Ty Cobb was voted into the Hall in the 1930s. The voters are, umm, different now than they were then, unless one of the original voters is like 140 years old and is still voting.

Pete Rose got the Joe Jackson treatment, which is actually fairly consistent thinking. The problem with this argument, though, is that NOBODY ON THE BWAA BANNED Rose! The commish did! Frankly, if Rose were on the ballot, I think the writers would vote him in without much pause.

SCD1234
Reputation: 98
Level: Superstar
Since: May 26, 2011

Posted on: January 10, 2012 10:17 am

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

Who made a mockery of their voting rights by choosing E4?? That voter should have his priviledges revoked.

I'm not going to get into a stats war arguing who should and shouldn't make it into the HOF based on this stat or that.? But here is something I do have an oppinion on.? To me, there is a difference between voting for a person because you think he should be in the HOF and voting for a person becasue you think a person deserves a VOTE for the HOF.?

I know some people will say, strongly that only people who deserve to be in the HOF should get a vote for the HOF, but I think that getting a vote is a legitamate honor in itself, and a voter wants to bestow that honor on a player, he has a right to do so.? Actually, they have a right to vote for anyone they want.? It is their decision.?

Besides, it's not like a stray vote here or there will accidently get someone elected to the Hall.? What, 75% of the voters think a guy should get a single vote?? Not anywhere near 75% of the voters even use votes this way, and those that do, do so sparingly.?

I'd say it highly unlikely that it even would cause someone to get 5% of the votes without the voters trying to make a lagitamate case for their enshrinment.?

So lay off the voters.? If they want to give a shout out to a player who meant a lot to them, and deserves a recognition in their opinion, then let them go ahead and give it to them.? It's only a single vote.?

Redsfan1507
Reputation: 99
Level: Superstar
Since: Sep 20, 2006

Posted on: January 10, 2012 10:14 am

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

Integrity issues aren't only surrounding the PED quagmire, the BBWAA has issues, too.

In an increasingly self serving and sensationalist industry, the BBWAA are now recieving pressure from Selig's office to extract some type of subjective, retroactive, "exclusion justice" in the HOF vote, as a defacto band aid?the MLB?integrity amputation that was brutally performed under Bud Selig's watch.

The HOF vote will forever be more subjective, and less credible because of integrity issues. The damage to MLB is irrepairable, but it isn't all about PED's.

Dale Murphy's HR and MVP count is pretty Barry Bonds-ish if you discount the 351 known PED HR's Bonds hit after age 35. Tim Raines' connection to cocaine made him no less dominant or deserving than fellow cokehead?(and HOF) Fergie Jenkins. McGwire, Palmiero, Canseco and Tejada are PED?shunned, but?A's teammate Rickey Henderson retired before the PED heat was turned up, and already is in the HOF. ?Ty Cobb admitted to blowing a game he managed to effect the AL Pennant outcome, and Pete Rose admitted to betting on his team to win as a manager, but Rose can't get on the HOF ballot as the All-Time hit leader, even though not a single hit was PED or gambling effected.

How is this mess in "The best interests of baseball" ? It isn't, but that IS the primary mission statement for the Commissoner Of Baseball...ALL this IS ON BUD SELIG'S WATCH, and he's still the top dog in MLB...THAT should be a crime.
?

Buttermaker
Reputation: 84
Level: All-Star
Since: Jan 13, 2007

Posted on: January 10, 2012 9:22 am

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

Please take the vote away from the writers.? As a group they are a joke!!!!!!

tripleight
Reputation: 90
Level: All-Star
Since: Jun 10, 2011

Posted on: January 10, 2012 7:40 am

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

Would people stop griping about the handful of votes that guys like Castilla, Salmon, and EY get? The voters know these guys arent going to get in, but most likely the player was a decent guy to that particular voter, so the voter threw him a vote. What's the big deal? Every single guy on this ballot had a good/great career and deserves to be on the ballot for consideration. They all played 10 years of baseball at the highest level of competition on the planet...that's impressive enough as it is.

Still, I'm a bit surprised that nobody voted for Sierra. I figured he'd get a vote or two just for his glory days with Texas back in the 80s. He led the league in triples, too, if I remember right.

And EY? The guy hit the most famous homerun in Rockies history when he homered to lead off the first Major League game ever played in Denver. I'd give em a vote for that alone.

lantern1
Reputation: 82
Level: All-Star
Since: Dec 19, 2006

Posted on: January 10, 2012 1:09 am

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

are you seriuos jack morris won 4 rings i use to love dale murphy but its not even close jack morris was the best pithcher in all of the 80's how can he not get voted in its a tragedy that the biggest? game pitcher isnt in the hall thats fing ridiculous 250 wins was ace on everystaff he was on made rotation better for every team he was on look at the yeasr on the twins and look at there pitchers record that year and look after he left lol.
I'm not sure which language you're trying to use, but I think I got the main points.? First, you should know Jack Morris didn't win 4 rings.? So if you're using that as your main point, you should rethink it.? Second, very few people would consider Jack Morris the best pitcher of the 80's.? He had the most wins in years that begin with 198, but there were several pitchers who were statistically better during that period.? Third, 250 wins is impressive but, again, that's as much a function of his durability and his awesome teammates as anything else.? Fourth, there are a lot of pitchers who made the rotations they pitched in better.

I'm not trying to bash Jack Morris here.? I would be perfectly OK with him making the Hall.? I just think some of these arguments are ridiculous.? Particularly the one that is factually wrong.

dirtyian1
Reputation: 71
Level: Pro
Since: Jul 29, 2011

Posted on: January 10, 2012 12:54 am

2012 Baseball Hall of Fame voting breakdown

totally agree ERIC DAVIS was best player on teams that won 2 rings no doubt about it.

Source: http://eye-on-baseball.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22297882/34288701?source=rss_blogs_MLB

lindsay lohan playboy cover lindsay lohan playboy cover shooting at virginia tech shooting at virginia tech blagojevich rod blagojevich rod blagojevich

Monday, January 9, 2012

Romney says discussion about contraception 'silly' (AP)

MANCHESTER, N.H. ? Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney tried to avoid answering a question about whether states should be able to ban contraceptives, insisting that they wouldn't want to anyway.

Romney seemed perplexed by the question and suggested it was irrelevant. Contraception, he said to laughs, is working "just fine."

The question was about whether a state could ban contraception, noting privacy was the reason cited in the last century in a case that overturned Connecticut's ban on contraception.

The right to privacy also was cited by the Supreme Court when it ruled in favor of abortion rights.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120108/ap_on_el_pr/us_gop_debate_contraception

whitney duncan bradley cooper elisabeth hasselbeck roger craig roger craig cadillac xts rambus

ViaSat residential satellite broadband internet hands-on (video)

Last Thursday, ViaSat announced pricing for its new home broadband service, which is set to deliver 12 Mbps+ download speeds (3 Mbps+ up) beginning next week for $50 per month. We just dropped by the company's demo home just a few feet from the Engadget trailer at the Las Vegas Convention Center parking lot to try it out, and were quite impressed with the speeds we saw, especially considering that data was passing through the ViaSat-1 satellite thousands of miles above the Earth. We've used other satellite internet services before, and while there's still just over a half-second of latency, bandwidth speeds were significantly faster than what we've experienced with other services in the past.

HD YouTube videos loaded very quickly, after a brief delay, as did Engadget and many other media-rich news websites. We performed a speed test and registered ping speeds of about 600ms, download speeds of about 30 Mbps and upload speeds of about 2 Mbps, but results aren't as accurate as they would be with a land-based connection because of latency and the way packet data is handled. We also placed a VOIP call, and while the delay was noticeable there, it was still usable. Want to see for yourself? Jump past the break as we step through ViaSat's front door to hop online.

Continue reading ViaSat residential satellite broadband internet hands-on (video)

ViaSat residential satellite broadband internet hands-on (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:46:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments


Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/0-CW-BLdUDA/

fracking fracking drosselmeyer drosselmeyer pacific standard time local time lsu alabama